Court order analysis
LiveRead a court order into its directions and next hearing; deadlines are computed only from dates the order states, otherwise marked "requires review".
- ✓Directions, next hearing and dates extracted from court orders and pleadings
- ✓Deadlines computed by code from anchors the order states, with calendar counting
- ✓"Requires review" for any period with no stated anchor
- ✓Direction → task on confirmation, with no due date when under review
What it is.
Run order analysis on a court order or pleading and it lists the directions, the next hearing and the dates in it. No deadline comes from the model. A date written in the order is parsed from the verified quote by code. A period such as "within four weeks" is computed only from an anchor the order itself states — its own date or a named date. Anything else — from service, from receipt, "forthwith" — is marked "Deadline requires review".
A direction becomes a task only when a person confirms it, and the next hearing is added to the matter's hearings on confirm. Hearing preparation is a workflow bound to that hearing: it can generate a hearing brief over the matter's facts, with each sentence linked to its support, and compile the documents since the last hearing.
Three steps.
End to end.
Store it on the matter as a court order and ask for order analysis.
Each direction shows its quote and either a computed deadline with its basis or "requires review".
Turn a direction into a task and record the next hearing. Nothing is filed until you confirm.
What you get.
- ✓Directions, next hearing and dates extracted from court orders and pleadings
- ✓Deadlines computed by code from anchors the order states, with calendar counting
- ✓"Requires review" for any period with no stated anchor
- ✓Direction → task on confirmation, with no due date when under review
- ✓Next hearing added to the matter on confirm
- ✓Hearing preparation workflow and a hearing brief with sentence-level support
Quick answers.
Not for a period it cannot anchor to a date the order states. Those are flagged for a person to decide.
No. It sets out the file; it states no outcome and invents no authority.
More in Litigation & Case Intelligence.
Read the matter's documents once into verified facts, then get issues, claims, contradictions, evidence gaps and a chronology — every row yours to edit.
A matter's stages from opening the file to the bundle, finished by the work itself — and a filing bundle PDF stamped with annexure numbers.
Draft from the matter's verified facts, with every factual sentence linked to its source, a deterministic check, and a lawyer → client → approved review chain.
Workflows for a legal notice, a cheque-bounce (s.138) matter and a consumer complaint — due dates computed from facts you enter, each with the rule stated.