Cross-border research
without the Westlaw bill.
SEC filings, UK Companies House, ESMA and eight more company-filing registries, fetched on request. Applicable-law profiles checked claim by claim at the official source in nine jurisdictions. For Indian firms going global and global firms entering India.
Try Global Layer →- ✓Company filings are fetched on request from eleven registries — SEC EDGAR, UK Companies House, ESMA, ACRA, ASIC, SEDAR+, CRO, AFM, FINMA, ISA and DART. There is no monitoring cron behind them; a query fetches, then persists.
- ✓The filings search is enabled per enterprise agreement. It is not switched on in any self-serve plan.
- ✓The applicable-law profile LexVio holds for a jurisdiction is generated, then every statutory claim in it is verified at the official source — nine adapters: GB (legislation.gov.uk), Ireland (Irish Statute Book), the EU (CELLAR), California (leginfo), Germany (gesetze-im-internet, BGB), the Netherlands (wetten.overheid.nl — confirms a citation exists, never “verified”), Australia (Federal Register of Legislation), Hong Kong (DATA.GOV.HK) and Ontario (e-Laws). DIFC is a documented refusal: its terms of use forbid what an adapter does. Everywhere else the answer is “unverified”, and the product says so.
- ✓Verification covers statutes and provisions, not case law, and a profile is published only after a named person signs it off — the job that verifies never publishes. Finding the Act is not confirming the claim: “verified” needs the provision text retrieved and the claim's terms present in it.
- ✓Foreign-law comparison sets Indian law side by side with foreign equivalents.
- ✓Cross-border tax analysis covers DTAA treaties, transfer pricing, and permanent establishment.
- ✓Built for Indian firms going global and multinational companies operating in India.
Eleven registries.
One search, on request.
Enabled per enterprise agreement; not on self-serve plans.
Nine official sources.
Checked, not asserted.
Each statutory claim in a jurisdiction's applicable-law profile is looked up at the source — one search, at most one provision fetch — before a person publishes the profile that the analysis prompt then reads. “Verified” needs the provision text retrieved and the claim's terms present in it; finding the Act alone caps at “unverified”. An outage is never “contradicted”. Case law is not verified this way.
Go global
from India.
Eleven filing registries on request. Applicable-law profiles checked at nine official sources. One platform.
Get started →