← All limitation periods
Family · Suits · Limitation Act, 1963

Declaration that an adoption is invalid:
how long do you have?

Last reviewed: 2026-08-19 · quoted from the India Code bare-Act PDF

Period of limitation
Three years.
Starting from — the column that decides

When the alleged adoption becomes known to the plaintiff.

Article 57Quoted verbatim from the India Code bare Act — including its as-printed spellings.

The Schedule row, as the Act prints it

Article 57

Description: To obtain a declaration that an alleged adoption is invalid, or never, in fact, took place.

Period: Three years.

Time from which period begins to run: When the alleged adoption becomes known to the plaintiff.

Open the bare Act on India Code →

In plain English

Challenges to an adoption's validity must be brought within three years of the challenger learning of the alleged adoption — typically fought in succession disputes over who inherits.

What can reset or extend this period

General rules for entries in the Suits division. The full statutory quotes (ss.5, 12, 18-19, 6-8) are on the finder page.

No condonation — ever

Section 5 applies only to appeals and applications, never to suits. A time-barred suit must be dismissed under s.3 'although limitation has not been set up as a defence'. There is no discretionary mercy for suits.

Acknowledgment and part-payment reset the clock

A written acknowledgment of liability signed by the party (s.18), or a part-payment acknowledged in the payer's handwriting or signed writing (s.19), gives a fresh period — but only if made BEFORE the current period expires. An acknowledgment of an already-barred debt creates no fresh period under this Act.

Computation exclusions

s.12(1) excludes the first day; s.4 lets you file on the reopening day if the period expires while the court is closed; s.14 excludes time spent prosecuting in good faith in a court without jurisdiction; s.15 excludes stay/injunction periods and statutory-notice time; s.17 postpones the start until discovery in cases of fraud, concealment or mistake. But s.9: once time begins to run, no subsequent disability stops it.

Legal disability

If the person entitled to sue is a minor or of unsound mind when the period would start, ss.6-7 let them sue within the same period after the disability ceases — capped by s.8 at three years from cessation, and denied entirely to pre-emption suits (Article 97).

Read the full statutory text of ss.5, 12, 18-19 and 6-8 →

More family periods
Art. 105
Hindu maintenance arrears · Three years
Art. 109
Setting aside a father's alienation (Mitakshara) · Twelve years
Art. 110
Share in joint family property (partition after exclusion) · Twelve years
← Previous
Art. 55 · Breach of contract (residuary)
Next →
Art. 58 · Declaration of title, or any other declaration
Back to all 68 limitation periods →

This is a reference to the statutory text, not advice on a live matter. Limitation is brutally fact-sensitive — when the cause of action accrued, whether an acknowledgment or part-payment reset the clock, and which exclusions under ss.4-15 apply all turn on your specific facts. This page is a reference to the statutory text, not advice on a live matter, and it does not create an advocate-client relationship. A single day's error can be fatal to a claim: s.5 condonation never applies to suits, and several special-statute deadlines (Arbitration s.34(3), IBC s.61(2)) are hard ceilings no court can extend. Verify every period against the bare Act as currently amended and against current case law, and take advice on your own facts before acting. Provisions here were reviewed on 19 August 2026.

The clock starts inside a document.
Let LexVio read it before the deadline does.

Try the free scanner →